New York, Combating Worker Abuse, Mandates Salon Owners to Secure Wage Bonds
A judge last week awarded Silvia Gonzalez, 49, and her daughter, both nail salon workers, more than $200,000 in wages owed and other damages.
For nearly six years, Silvia Gonzalez
opened the doors of Romy’s Nails in Brooklyn at about 8:45 a.m. and left more
than 12 hours later, six days a week. She performed manicures and pedicures
with no lunch break, making $55 a day, or about $4.50 an hour. After Ms.
Gonzalez had worked there four years, her pay increased to $80 a day, which was
still below minimum wage. She recalled hearing her employer often proclaim to
workers, many of whom were working illegally in the country, that no one could
win against him in court.
Ms. Gonzalez
proved him wrong. Sort of.
Last
week a judge in Federal District Court in Brooklyn awarded Ms. Gonzalez, 49,
and her daughter Martha Mendoza Gonzalez, 30, who also worked at the salon,
more than $200,000 in wages owed and other damages. But their lawyer has said
collecting that amount from the defendant in the case, Romelia Agudo, will
probably be difficult.
To help ensure that future nail salon
workers who win judgments against their employers in wage theft cases are paid,
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, will put into effect a new rule on Monday.
All nail salon owners will be required to secure wage bonds by Oct. 6, or face
fines and other penalties, including the possible closing of their businesses.
Salon owners would be able to use the bonds to pay legal judgments against them
in wage-theft cases.
“Requiring
owners to secure a wage bond will help ensure workers are paid what they are
legally owed and that businesses have the funds they need to meet their
financial obligations,” Mr. Cuomo said in a statement.
The
requirement is the latest in a series of reforms the governor hasintroduced to address worker abuse and
exploitation in nail salons after The New York Times published a two-part investigation on the industry in May.
The
size of the bond that nail salons will be required to secure will depend on the
number of employees at each business and the total number of hours those
employees work. For example, at a salon with two to five full-time employees,
the required bond would be at least $25,000. The cost of the bond would
generally be 2 to 3 percent of the value of the bond.
The multiagency
task force that the
Cuomo administration established to carry out reforms in the nail salon
industry will inspect salons to ensure the requirement is met.
Sarah
Ahn, an organizer for the Flushing Workers Center, a workers’ organization,
said it has become commonplace for nail salon owners to claim to have no means
to pay judgments against them in wage-theft cases, often after taking steps to
hide their assets.
“It’s
really become part of the bigger practice,” she said.
Ms. Ahn worked closely with six
manicurists from Babi, a Long Island chain of nail salons. The manicurists won a court
award of more than
$474,000 in 2012 for underpayment, but they have managed to collect only around
$110,000. The chain’s owner, In Bae Kim, said he did not have the money to pay
the judgment, but records showed that just before the trial, he sold property
worth several million dollars.
“It’s like a chasing game,” Ms. Ahn
said.
Still,
she criticized the new rule because she said it continued to put the onus on
the employer to take steps to protect workers. She favors a measure that would
allow employees to place liens against an employer’s property until their wages
are paid.
Kara
Miller, a lawyer representing 10 former employees of the Envy Nails chain who
are suing their employer for wages owed, said the requirement would be “a huge
leap forward in protecting workers.”
Donald
Yu, chairman of the board of directors for the Korean-American Nail Salon
Association of New York, said it was too early to provide an opinion on the
requirement.
Ms.
Gonzalez’s daughter, Martha, who worked with her at Romy’s for several months
in 2005, said being able to collect on the judgment would allow them to pay
rent, bills and other expenses.
“It’s
for survival,” she said in Spanish.
Martha Gonzalez worked at Romy’s
nearly 12 hours a day, six days a week, initially for $30 a day, and then her
pay went up slightly to $35 a day. One month into the job, she said, she became
pregnant with her second child.
She and her mother worked for Galo
Agudo, the brother of Ms. Agudo, the defendant in the case. The younger Ms.
Gonzalez said Mr. Agudo’s wife criticized her, sometimes in front of clients,
for her fits of nausea and vomiting, saying she should be stronger during her
pregnancy. Ms. Gonzalez said she usually had no lunch break, or she would sometimes
get only three minutes to eat before she went back to work. She said she left
in September 2005 because she no longer wanted to deal with the working
conditions.
“I
knew that would all affect my child,” she said.
It
was not until her mother was fired in 2009 that the two, both immigrants from
Mexico, decided to take legal action.
The
elder Ms. Gonzalez said she kept quiet regarding the abuse and humiliation she
said she faced throughout her tenure at Romy’s Nails. She said Mr. Agudo’s wife
would call her old and weak in front of customers.
Before
her dismissal in June 2009, the elder Ms. Gonzalez said she took a month off
after having an operation on her left foot. Shortly afterward, she said, she
returned to Romy’s Nails hoping to get back to work. Instead, Ms. Gonzalez
said, Mr. Agudo told her she could not work in her condition.
“They
closed the doors on me,” she said, holding back tears while sitting in her
apartment in Jamaica, Queens.
As
the mother and daughter wait to hear about collecting their court award, Ms.
Agudo, the defendant in the case, has moved to Florida, which could further
complicate matters.
The
Gonzalezes continue to work in the nail industry and have been employed at
various salons. For Silvia Gonzalez, the award would go in part toward her
dream of one day opening her own nail salon.
“I wouldn’t mistreat my workers,” Ms. Gonzalez
said.
New York, Combating Worker Abuse, Mandates Salon Owners to Secure Wage Bonds
Reviewed by Unknown
on
02:51
Rating:
Post a Comment